The five-year jinx catches up to us again
We thought we had foiled the rule of fives, but we were wrong.
Our first two bad years had been five years apart – 1989 and 1994 –
with pretty good to excellent years between. So, we held our breath
in 1999 (five years after the previous down year) and we squeaked
through with a decent season. So, come 2004, we had thought we
were home free and had beaten the five-year jinx. We weren’t and we
hadn’t.
In a sentence, 2004 was the worst year The Turkey Farm
has had. So bad, in fact, that if we don’t pull out of it in 2005,
we will retire.

Our problem in 1989 had been growing too fast – we jumped from 800
birds in 1988 to 2,200 – and underpricing our wholesale birds at
Thanksgiving. We lost about $15,000. In 1994, the problem was a
refrigerator truck we rented from O’Hara Ice in Rockland, and we
lost another $15,000 when Thanksgiving birds spoiled while we had
thought they were safely refrigerated.
In 2004, the problem
was fowl cholera, with which we have been battling for three years.
Each time we think we’ve whipped it, cholera comes back stronger
than ever. Other than the cholera, the farm had record or near
record years in other areas, including the Fryeburg Fair, the
Brunswick Farmers’ Market and sales at our farmstore.
We started the 2004 season on Feb. 6 with a flock of 700 birds
hatched that day at Mont-St-Gregoire, P.Q. The birds brooded well
and began spending days outside by the end of March. A little
more than a year earlier, we had secured a vaccine for the serotype
9 cholera that had been identified as the culprit on our farm by Dr.
Michael Opitz of the University of Maine. The “killed” vaccine had
been made by Maine Biological Laboratories in Winslow.
MBL
stored the vaccine for us to pick up a few bottles at a time when we
needed it. But when we called in late February to arrange pickup, we
learned that MBL had destroyed our vaccine and would not make more
for us. That ended a 15-year arrangement in which we secured the
baby Turkeys that the lab used (at no added cost to MBL) and MBL
made vaccines available to us.
On the recommendation of Dr. Opitz, we switched to a live vaccine and vaccinated in late March.
Come April, they went outside to stay. We vaccinated then and again
in late May. (Live vaccine needs to be boosted about every four
weeks.) In early June, we began seeing mortality in the flock.
Boosting the vaccine again didn’t help, so we began dressing those
birds in July but before we finished dressing the entire flock, we
had lost about 40 percent of it. Our next flock hatched in
late April, and when we moved it outside in June, mortality was very
low, so we thought we were beating the cholera.
We weren’t.
As it developed, the live vaccine didn’t hold past the second
boosting, which was at 13 to 14 weeks of age. We lost more
than half the birds from the flock hatched on June 14. We lost 40
percent of those hatched on July 16 and nearly 40 percent of those
hatched on July 29. We lost more than 25 percent of the Christmas
flock, hatched on Aug. 16.
The loss of the June 14 flock
meant we hadn’t nearly enough 18-pound hens or 20-pounds-and-up toms
for the Thanksgiving trade. These are the most popular sizes for
retail. Faced with the failure of the live vaccine, we
switched, on Dr. Opitz’s recommendation, to a broad-spectrum
antibiotic (chlorotetracycline) to shore up the birds’ immune system
and help them fight the disease naturally.
The serotype 9
cholera may have come here with wild animals. We’ll never know, but
a wild animal might have eaten a wild turkey that died of the
disease and then carried the disease to our ranges where it could
have deposited the cholera in our feeders or directly onto one or
more of our birds. When a Turkey with cholera pecks another
Turkey, it can transmit the cholera to the pecked bird. The
organism can even travel on the clothing and boots of people who go
onto the ranges.
To prevent spreading cholera by human contact, one or another of us
would tend only a pen containing contaminated birds while others
worked only in the pens not yet contaminated. We made a
“walkabout” every few hours in the contaminated pens to pull out
mortality and to isolate birds that appeared sick. The person doing
the walkabout changed boots and sometimes pants after each cruise.
We washed and sanitized the tractor after each trip into a
contaminated yard.
Despite this biosecurity, the disease gradually
spread throughout the farm. For 2005, we have found a laboratory in
Iowa to make a new “killed” vaccine. We expect it to be delivered
just in time to vaccinate the first flock of birds for 2005, which
is to hatch March 24 in Quebec.
Without the cholera, 2004
might have been a decent year. The generally wet autumn broke for
the eight days of the Fryeburg Fair, and we returned to within 1
percent of our record income of 2002. Sales at the Brunswick
Farmers’ Market rose by 17.6 percent, and the final day of market,
Oct. 30, was our best day ever at any market. Sales at our farmstore rose by about 3 percent, largely due to the increasing
popularity of our Turkey pies.
Thanksgiving sales would have neared a record, absent the cholera.
As it was, we had fewer and smaller birds to sell. To get an
idea of the scale of the financial loss, look at our major fixed
cost: processing. It costs virtually the same to dress a 14-pound
Turkey as to dress a 22-pound Turkey. But the 14-pounder brings in
$18.32 less. One needn’t be a math whiz to see that when we
lack several hundred 20-pound Turkeys we can lose a bundle.
Christmas sales were a record high, but we dress fewer than a fifth
the number of birds at Christmas that we dress at Thanksgiving, so
Christmas didn’t go far toward making up the sales lost at
Thanksgiving. In 2004, more people signed up for shares in
Community Supported Agriculture (see article on Page 3) than in any
of the six previous seasons.
We sold 52 shares to 44 people (eight used up their shares and
renewed during the year), up from 46 shares in 2003. Our top
priority this year will be controlling cholera. More on that when we
publish our goals for 2005 in the next issue of The Turkey Times.

No heritage breeds for this year
We asked in the Thanksgiving issue of The Turkey Times whether
people wanted us to raise a small flock of heritage Turkeys.
The response was not strong enough for us to decide to raise the
heirloom Turkeys. We needed about four dozen commitments, but
customers came forward for only a bit more than one dozen. We may make the offer again for next year, but for 2005, we won’t
venture into traditional Turkeys. Heritage Turkeys are those breeds
that have been superceded by the faster– and larger-growing strains
of Turkey that virtually all growers use today.
They are
regaining popularity because some people believe they taste better
and because people who are concerned about the genetic variety of
our livestock don’t want to see any breeds die out. When a
breed dies out, its unique genetic material goes with it, and the
world loses forever the opportunity to go back through selective
breeding and pull up the genetic traits from those strains that
might make for even better turkeys in the future. If some of the
heritage strains contained natural resistance to infections,
scientists could breed that resistance into the next generations of
Turkeys just as they have bred vertcilium resistance into tomatoes.